Read the full worked scenarios and assumptionsCompare the old way with a recorded workflow and inspect the assumptions.Compare the worked examples +Close section −
Month-end hours dispute
The old way: The client's monthly hours statement lands. 180 hours billed, 152 paid. The 28-hour gap walks because your record is a verbal handover and three operator notes. At GHS 600/hour internal-hire rate that is GHS 16,800 absorbed per machine on one dispute.
On Darikoda: Operator PIN at start, stop and idle. Hour-meter time-stamped with GPS. The subcontractor opens the same structured record you do. The deduction conversation happens with evidence rather than assertion.
Per-event hour-meter: the unit at which the deduction game becomes winnable.
Fuel deduction against the supplied litres
The old way: You supplied 4,200 litres to the subcontractor this month. Their record shows 3,800. The 400-litre gap is deducted from your invoice. The dispense receipt is unsigned and dated three weeks late.
On Darikoda: Each dispense attributed to the dispensing operator and evidenced at the event. The fuel ledger is structured rather than reconstructed. The deduction conversation has evidence on your side.
USD 5K / month: recovery on a USD 100K monthly diesel supplied at 5% absorbed variance. (Illustrative model, your number from the audit.)
Idle machine no one knew was free
The old way: Excavator parked on completed scope at Project A for three weeks. Project D urgently needs one. Subcontractor at Project D rents externally at premium rate. You pay depreciation on the idle machine; they pay rental on someone else's machine; the same brand on both sides.
On Darikoda: Daily-status view: earning, idle, faulty, not needed, available for transfer. Project D head office sees the available machine the morning it becomes free. The redeployment conversation happens before the external rental.
Redeployment view: what can move, what should stay, what needs a low-bed.